<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Reform Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk</link>
	<description>Media Reform coordinates the work of advocacy groups campaigning to protect the public interest in light of the Leveson Inquiry and Communications Review.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our Media Not Theirs &#8211; Rally For Media Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anotherarc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report finds Leveson coverage heavy on invective, light on facts</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/report-finds-leveson-coverage-heavy-on-invective-light-on-facts?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=report-finds-leveson-coverage-heavy-on-invective-light-on-facts</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/report-finds-leveson-coverage-heavy-on-invective-light-on-facts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Ethics and Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[. media alarmism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alarmism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveson Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Standards Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal charter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On some days, reading press coverage of the Leveson Report and its convoluted aftermath feels like having Fleet Street line up behind one megaphone and shout in your face through it. Now a report from the Media Standards Trust indicates that<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/report-finds-leveson-coverage-heavy-on-invective-light-on-facts">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/report-finds-leveson-coverage-heavy-on-invective-light-on-facts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time to put media ownership at the top of the agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/its-time-to-put-media-ownership-at-the-top-of-the-agenda?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-time-to-put-media-ownership-at-the-top-of-the-agenda</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/its-time-to-put-media-ownership-at-the-top-of-the-agenda#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords communications select committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords select committee on communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market concentration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media plurality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest obligations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ With Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman’s call for a new Communications Bill establishing rules on media ownership, the vast power of a handful of British media owners is back on the agenda. Or at least it should be – though<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/its-time-to-put-media-ownership-at-the-top-of-the-agenda">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/its-time-to-put-media-ownership-at-the-top-of-the-agenda/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a myth that Parliament hasn&#8217;t approved the cross-party Charter</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/its-a-myth-that-parliament-hasnt-approved-the-cross-party-charter?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-a-myth-that-parliament-hasnt-approved-the-cross-party-charter</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/its-a-myth-that-parliament-hasnt-approved-the-cross-party-charter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Ethics and Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Courts Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Courts Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic Ponsford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houses of Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London School of Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rival charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rival Royal Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Greenslade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal charter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a strange kind of hypocrisy in the way some Fleet Street representatives use and abuse the notion of Parliamentary approval. As it happens, the claim that the cross-party Royal Charter &#8211; which will now be delayed beyond May<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/its-a-myth-that-parliament-hasnt-approved-the-cross-party-charter">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/its-a-myth-that-parliament-hasnt-approved-the-cross-party-charter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for caps: how to make media ownership policy work</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/the-case-for-caps-response-to-harriet-harman-on-ownership?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-case-for-caps-response-to-harriet-harman-on-ownership</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/the-case-for-caps-response-to-harriet-harman-on-ownership#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birkbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSkyB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail and General Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic and accountable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harriet Harman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Schlosberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media plurality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest obligations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Burlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Hewlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph Media Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Justin Schlosberg Last night’s Radio 4 Media Show featured an interview with shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman where she was pressed by Steve Hewlett on the burgeoning issue of what to do about media plurality. In response, she reiterated<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/the-case-for-caps-response-to-harriet-harman-on-ownership">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/the-case-for-caps-response-to-harriet-harman-on-ownership/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our detractors attack anything about us except our ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/blog/our-detractors-attack-anything-about-us-except-our-ideas?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=our-detractors-attack-anything-about-us-except-our-ideas</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/blog/our-detractors-attack-anything-about-us-except-our-ideas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Gilligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Des Freedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigatory journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millbank Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millbank Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Fenton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Staines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph Media Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sunday Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Montgomerie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trotskyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With first the Telegraph and now the Times launching substance-free wink-nudge coverage of the Media Reform Coalition, we can say with confidence: we&#8217;ve finally made it. We&#8217;re famous! Hot on the heels of Andrew Gilligan&#8217;s confused precis of our policies for the<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/blog/our-detractors-attack-anything-about-us-except-our-ideas">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/blog/our-detractors-attack-anything-about-us-except-our-ideas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our media &#8211; not theirs! Rally for media reform, June 17th</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform-june-17th?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform-june-17th</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform-june-17th#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Grayson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveson Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveson Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Justice Leveson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Union of Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7pm,  University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1 (closest tube Oxford Circus) The last year has given us an unprecedented understanding of the power of the owners and editors of the British press. The Leveson Inquiry showed that a handful<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform-june-17th">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/get-involved/our-media-not-theirs-rally-for-media-reform-june-17th/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This press barons&#8217; charter is neither independent nor fair</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/uncategorized/this-press-barons-charter-is-neither-independent-nor-fair?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=this-press-barons-charter-is-neither-independent-nor-fair</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/uncategorized/this-press-barons-charter-is-neither-independent-nor-fair#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the rulers of Fleet Street have thumbed their nose at four months of negotiations, campaigns and public protests to propose a Royal Charter which suits their aims. This press barons’ charter not only replicates but actually worsens the problems<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/uncategorized/this-press-barons-charter-is-neither-independent-nor-fair">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/uncategorized/this-press-barons-charter-is-neither-independent-nor-fair/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs are be exempted now &#8211; but does the new wording work?</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/blogs-are-be-exempted-now-but-does-the-new-wording-work?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=blogs-are-be-exempted-now-but-does-the-new-wording-work</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/blogs-are-be-exempted-now-but-does-the-new-wording-work#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Ethics and Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloggers' consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrots and sticks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation for bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost protections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Courts Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemplary damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlocal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlocal blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income threshold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maria miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media and Sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-author blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnover threshold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government, responding to urgent approaches from Media Reform and others, has confirmed that the cost benefits available to those who sign up for regulation will be extended to all those news bloggers who are too small to sign up.<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/blogs-are-be-exempted-now-but-does-the-new-wording-work">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/blogs-are-be-exempted-now-but-does-the-new-wording-work/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Andrew Gilligan, we do not want content regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/no-andrew-gilligan-we-do-not-want-content-regulation?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=no-andrew-gilligan-we-do-not-want-content-regulation</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/no-andrew-gilligan-we-do-not-want-content-regulation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dodds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Gilligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Hammersley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Co-ordinating Committee for Media Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enders Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Level Group on Media Freedom and Pluralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal plurality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Curran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveson Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media plurality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Reform Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Standards Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediadem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaWise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PressBof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest obligations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rally for Media Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediareform.org.uk/?p=2465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you heard? The Media Reform Coalition is part of a plot by the European Union to take control of the British press. At least that’s what seems to be implied in an article by Andrew Gilligan in this week’s<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/no-andrew-gilligan-we-do-not-want-content-regulation">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediareform.org.uk/media-ownership-2/no-andrew-gilligan-we-do-not-want-content-regulation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
