Media Reform Coalition

Media Reform coordinates the work of advocacy groups campaigning to protect the public interest in light of the Leveson Inquiry and Communications Review.

  • Home
  • About
    • Media pluralism
    • Ethical journalism
    • Investigative and local journalism
  • Support
  • Resources
    • Media Activist Toolkit
    • Media Ownership Reports
    • Parliamentary Submissions
    • Other MRC Documents
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Document Library
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Privacy

Decriminalising TV licence fee evasion will cut BBC funding without helping the poorest

October 5, 2020 By Media Reform Coalition

by Leo Watkins

On 9 December last year, mere days before the General Election, Boris Johnson was having a bad news day. He was televised in the morning trying to avoid being confronted by a reporter’s evidence of a young boy sleeping on the floor of an NHS hospital (with the insinuation being that he was being denied proper medical care). Later in the day, his health secretary, Matt Hancock, told journalists he had been assaulted by anti-Tory protesters outside Leeds general hospital. This account was repeated by senior journalists until video footage emerged showing that Hancock had actually only walked into a protestor’s hand.

Licence fee abolition as a ‘dead cat’

In response, a question from a reporter about TV licences at a press conference allowed Johnson to pull off a classic case of what his former campaign advisor, Lynton Crosby, infamously dubbed the “dead cat” strategy: you respond to a bad news cycle by putting something surprising and attention-grabbing on the table to distract everyone and change the topic of conversation. In this case, Johnson mooted the idea of getting rid of the TV licence altogether.[1] (Of course, it helps if your fellow right-wingers in the press and the main broadcasters are all too happy to change the topic too.)

The BBC’s existence has long challenged beliefs that the market ought to be the sole judge of value, and that requiring the public to pay for some broadcasting with public service rather than commercial aims is an infringement on freedom. In addition, the right-wing press tends to believe that a key reason it finds it difficult to make money online is the combined fault of, on the one hand, digital giants like Facebook and Google for monopolising advertising revenue, and on the other, the BBC for providing a decent, free source of news which reduces the need to take out a digital subscription to a newspaper to have adequate sources of news. Digital ‘convergence’ has put the BBC and the national press in much more direct competition than in the past, when the latter had print and the former had radio and TV: mediums whose use overlapped to some extent, but not entirely.

Today, conservative ideology and evolving press commercial interests have combined to make any negative story about the BBC even more interesting to right-wing newspaper editors than it was before. As an experienced politician and former newspaper journalist himself, it’s fair to assume Johnson knew that when he threw the ‘abolishing the licence fee’ cat onto the table. And indeed, the right-wing press dutifully picked up on and prioritised the story.

After the Conservative victory on 12 December, the Government moved quickly to brief the media that changing the BBC would rank high on its priority list. There was some suggestion of ‘getting even’ with the BBC for its apparently unfair treatment of the Party during the election campaign – despite, or perhaps because of, vociferous complaints of the same from supporters of Labour and Jeremy Corbyn, and despite the Conservatives’ large Parliamentary majority.

Government control over the licence fee

The Government’s immediate options for changing the BBC are limited. The Government will get to appoint a new chair of the BBC board when David Clementi’s term finishes next year, but it can’t get rid of the licence fee before the end of the current Royal Charter period, which lasts until the end of 2026. The Charter does, however, provide for a ‘mid-term review’ of BBC governance, and an opportunity to set the licence fee level for the five years from 2022.

Government control over the level of the licence fee – the BBC’s primary source of funding – has, particularly since the 1980s, been used repeatedly as a means of exerting influence over the Corporation. In 2010, George Osborne imposed severe real-terms cuts on the BBC by keeping the licence fee level flat in cash terms. According to the BBC’s 2019/20 Annual Report, its income is 31% lower today than it would have been if the level had increased in line with inflation. While the BBC may draw an increasing amount of its income from commercial sources, 71% of its income in 2019-20 still came from the licence fee. And commercial revenue sources come with different constraints, like what foreign distributors want to buy.

The BBC is facing intense competition for audiences from big, new digital rivals whose spending on content is rapidly rising, like Netflix, Amazon, Disney and Apple, alongside familiar rivals like ITV and Sky (now owned by Comcast). There is dramatic cost inflation in the most in-demand formats, like original scripted fictional series. (Netflix reportedly spent an enormous $130m on two series of The Crown, for example.) In this situation, even real-terms increases in the level of the licence fee aren’t enough for the BBC to keep pace.

The BBC’s income from licence fees is determined not only by the licence fee’s level, but by its method of collection too. A high rate of licence fee evasion would slash its budget just as surely as an inadequate licence fee settlement. At the moment, the BBC manages collection efficiently: collection costs are a small percentage of revenue (3.6%) and the rate of evasion has remained low for many years, at around 6-7%. But that might not continue.

Decriminalising licence fee evasion

In February, Government sources briefed the press that the Government was planning to decriminalise licence fee evasion. The DCMS launched a consultation, claiming that “the broadcasting landscape has changed” since 2015 when an independent review of the matter by David Perry QC concluded there was “no compelling basis for change” to the current system. The DCMS didn’t commission a new review to demonstrate its claim. For the DCMS, the obvious danger of doing so is that an independent review can’t be relied upon to provide the desired answer.

The case usually made for decriminalisation is quite simple. There are two main arguments. The first is that prosecutions for evasion are ‘clogging up’ magistrates’ courts, at great cost to the taxpayer. The Perry Review dealt with this argument by citing evidence that, in 2013, they may have represented 11% of cases handled, but only took up 0.3% of court time because they were quick to process and many defendants pleaded guilty by post. The cost to the taxpayer is small: around £5m a year. The Government, not the BBC, gets the proceeds from fines that courts impose for evasion.

The key argument, though, is that a criminal penalty is an unfair, disproportionate and heavy-handed sanction for evasion. However, that argument’s apparent strength is partly based on some basic misconceptions:

  • The first misconception that those that think a criminal penalties for license fee evasion are unfair tend to harbor, is that anyone convicted of licence fee evasion gets a lasting criminal record. In fact, it’s a ‘non-recordable offence’ which doesn’t show up on DBS checks.
  • The second misconception is that people hear ‘criminal penalty’ and think it means they will go to jail for TV licence evasion. That isn’t what happens. TV Licensing – the BBC by another name – isn’t looking for excuses to lock people up. In fact, even where evasion is proven, all that happens in the first instance is that TV Licensing sends people letters telling them to buy a TV licence. If they don’t, and if TV Licensing decides it has enough evidence against them, eventually they will be summoned to the local magistrates’ court for a hearing. At any stage, TV Licensing will drop proceedings if people buy a licence.
  •  If convicted at the hearing, people get a fine whose level is set taking contextual factors, like ability to pay, into account. Payment can be instalments – £5 a week is the usual maximum for those in receipt of state benefits. The average fine in 2018 was £176, the legal maximum is £1,000. The Commons DCMS committee noted that the punishment is similar to using a vehicle untaxed or without insurance. Nobody goes to prison for licence fee evasion.
  •  If someone repeatedly fails to pay a fine for licence fee evasion imposed by the court, despite having been proven able to do so, they may eventually receive a prison sentence – but only once all other enforcement methods have been exhausted. This is the same as for any other court-imposed fine for any other number of minor offences – council tax evasion, for instance. The Perry Review was at pains to point all this out back in 2015.

In 2018, proceedings were commenced against 129,446 people for licence fee evasion, of whom 121,203 were convicted (the majority of non-convictions were because people bought a licence in the meantime), and only five people were imprisoned for not paying court fines that included – but were not necessarily limited to – fines for licence fee evasion. To reiterate: imprisonment for court fines only occurs as a last resort, when all other collection methods have been exhausted.

The unfair distribution of the licence fee burden

It is nevertheless true that this system is manifestly unfair. The licence fee’s cost to each household takes no account of households’ disposable income and resultant (in)ability to pay. (Exceptions are those over-75, who get a free licence if in receipt of pension credit, those in long-term care, who pay £7.50 a year, and the severely sight impaired, who get 50% off.) On that basis, people argue that criminalising evasion amounts to criminalising people for being too poor to pay. They then say that, in order to ease the burden on the poorest, we should replace the criminal penalty for evasion with a civil one.

The premise of this argument is true, but its conclusion does not follow. Clearly, the flat cost of the licence fee – like the flat costs of other utilities like gas, electricity, water and household internet – is hardest to meet for those on the lowest incomes. When Amelia Gentleman, the Guardian’s social affairs correspondent, went to a magistrates’ court in 2014 to observe proceedings for licence fee evasion offences, she estimated that most cases involve people in poverty or financial difficulties. A wave of recent changes to council tax benefit eligibility, occasioned by local government austerity, seemed to have exacerbated those difficulties.

But not only does the argument’s conclusion not follow, it’s patently ridiculous. First of all, while the licence fee is indeed a distributionally regressive ‘flat tax’, changing the penalty for evading it does nothing to ease its financial burden on those who continue to pay it. The argument for decriminalisation implies actively wanting the rate of evasion to rise. Secondly, there’s no guarantee that it will be the poorest or the least able to pay who will successfully evade payment. The assumption that it will be, seems to reflect a Victorian class prejudice that the poorest are the most skilled at getting away with breaking the law. Of course, as far as tax evasion in general goes, the truth is the opposite. In reality, some people would get away with evasion and some wouldn’t; of those who did, many would be well-off people who are perfectly able to pay; the result would be arbitrary and unfair.

What the people making this argument therefore implicitly concede – indeed, seem actively to want – is that decriminalisation would cause an increase in evasion. It would do so, first, because replacing the criminal penalty with a civil one would hugely complicate enforcement. At the moment, to prove someone was guilty of the offence, TV Licensing just has to prove they were watching TV without a licence at some point. To prove you owe the BBC a civil debt, on the other hand, it would have somehow to prove the duration in which you watched TV unlicensed. The evidence-gathering necessary would often not prove cost-effective, given the amount likely to be recovered.

The BBC estimates that the cost of decriminalisation would be around £300m annually – due to increased collection costs and reduced income – equating to around 9% of its licence fee income in 2019-20, or 6% of its total income.[2] In other words, this policy is another Conservative attack on BBC funding, pure and simple, cynically dressed up by its supporters as a sincere concern to protect the poorest. The insincerity of that concern is even more clear from a cursory examination of the alternative enforcement method: civil penalties enforced through the civil court system.

For a civil penalty to have anything like the deterrent effect necessary to prevent widespread evasion, the BBC has estimated a financial penalty of around £500 would be required. Such a penalty would not take into account people’s ability to pay, by definition. The result is that some people would, perversely, end up owing more from a civil penalty than a court fine for evasion.

To collect unpaid penalties or debts, the BBC would have to get a county court judgement (CCJ) authorising bailiffs to go and seize property. CCJs linger on people’s credit records, often for several years. They impact people’s ability to get a phone contract or car insurance, to take out a loan, or even to get a job (some employers check credit records). This doesn’t seem a way to ease the burden on people living in poverty.

The way forward: two suggestions

There are two real solutions to the unquestionable and appalling fact that, in Britain today, some people are so poor they find it hard to afford the £157.50 annual cost of a TV licence. The first would be to alleviate the underlying poverty. It is eminently within the state’s power to do so. But in the low-growth, post-2008 era, it would require a willingness on the part of the state to raise taxes on the well-off and aggressively reduce tax avoidance by wealthy individuals and large corporations. The whole trend of Conservative policy over the last decade has been in the opposite direction. Austerity hit the poorest the hardest, which is probably why the number of licence fee evasion cases rose after 2010.

The second solution would be to exempt low-income households from paying the licence fee. In Germany, low-income households are exempt from the broadcasting levy. In Finland, the broadcasting income tax is not payable below a defined income threshold. Free TV licences for the poorest million households in Britain would therefore be neither internationally unprecedented, nor financially unaffordable. It would cost the Government a mere £157.5m a year, approximately 0.02% of the 2019/20 Government budget, less than the cost of two RAF F-35 stealth fighter jets (cost: £92m each).

In the long run, the licence fee could be replaced with a more progressive and universal funding mechanism. The Finnish broadcasting income tax, for example, seems to be the most egalitarian funding mechanism in Europe. The UK Government’s Minister of State for Media, John Whittingdale, was chair of the DCMS committee when it looked at that option alongside the German household broadcasting levy. The Times reported that the BBC internally favours the latter.

But some parts of the Conservative Party – and some in Number 10 – would seem to want the BBC to become, either wholly or in part, an ‘opt-in’, subscription-funded service. How much of the BBC you get would be contingent on your ability to pay. Quite apart from the cost and practical challenge of deploying conditional access to the technology across the country, the consequence would be to punish poverty in a different way: by depriving people of access to BBC programmes and services if they can’t afford them.

Ultimately, this issue comes down to whether you agree that, as a society, we should make at least some journalism, education and culture freely available to everyone – regardless of ability to pay. When you consider the enormously important, formative role that these things play in the lives of children, for example, the contribution to cultural-educational inequality and exclusion implied by the private, subscription-funded route becomes especially egregious. If we accept that, then it follows that some kind of tax is necessary to pay for it. But there are methods of taxation much more progressive than the licence fee, which we could and should use to do so.

The arguments for decriminalisation are based on false premises and absurd logic, motivated by a Conservative agenda to further reduce the BBC’s funding, make the current system intolerable to the BBC itself, and get it to accept a future of private, subscription funding – at least in part. But the right-wing vision for the BBC is an elitist and exclusionary one, dishonestly presented as a concern to expand freedom of choice. It should be exposed as such, and fought. Decriminalisation will require primary legislation, so it will soon be up to MPs and peers to decide whether they agree with this agenda. This situation calls for a high-profile campaign to oppose the measure, as part of a more general effort to reframe the debate on the future funding of public service broadcasting in progressive terms.

[1] Johnson: “At this stage we are not planning to get rid of all TV licences, though I am certainly looking at it. … I think the system of funding out of what is effectively a general tax…bears reflection, let me put it that way. How long can you justify a system whereby everybody who has a TV has to pay to fund a particular set of TV and radio channels? That is the question.”

[2] Television Licence Fee Trust Statement for the Year Ending 31 March 2020, p. 28, paragraph 10

Leo Watkins is a PhD student in Media and Communications at Goldsmiths, University of London and lead researcher for the Media Reform Coalition for the UK component of the Media Influence Matrix Project, set up to investigate the influence of shifts in policy, funding sources and technology on contemporary journalism. The project is funded in the UK by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and is due to report in spring 2021.

This blog was originally published by Media@LSE and is reproduced with their kind permission.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Skype
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Blog, Get Involved, Media Democracy, Media Ownership, Press Ethics and Regulation Tagged With: BBC, Boris Johnson, decriminalisation, licence fee

Comments

  1. SqiHyWrgYFd TwQXBVbU says

    October 8, 2020 at 10:32 pm

    WunMGHbQBL

  2. SqiHyWrgYFd TwQXBVbU says

    October 8, 2020 at 10:32 pm

    tegzTAsrcVuEGK

  3. GDWIapyBuPxi qlEFSgtTwoCVD says

    October 9, 2020 at 1:17 am

    SsGjqQEtTLWy

  4. GDWIapyBuPxi qlEFSgtTwoCVD says

    October 9, 2020 at 1:18 am

    hOobzalernwk

  5. ARpfytCPzUc ofPLSnlDw says

    October 9, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    mCpSvsceOlfWnhE

  6. ARpfytCPzUc ofPLSnlDw says

    October 9, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    FaxNJYQhKAzocUGO

  7. HnXCVRmKoyQ gzXbANRjf says

    October 10, 2020 at 10:43 am

    JoTjSVMerADpb

  8. HnXCVRmKoyQ gzXbANRjf says

    October 10, 2020 at 10:43 am

    vIQtrJNouqeFY

  9. GaCrJsFI RpMdLJoIUG says

    October 10, 2020 at 10:35 pm

    diQALMxvIwKt

  10. GaCrJsFI RpMdLJoIUG says

    October 10, 2020 at 10:36 pm

    QJGfsxmuLtdKHDC

  11. UlXCHEnkSpbyeJht mVqlFobGByntZ says

    October 11, 2020 at 11:32 am

    iKGaSPFqyrvNlL

  12. UlXCHEnkSpbyeJht mVqlFobGByntZ says

    October 11, 2020 at 11:32 am

    LfnGBNkyxDuSbrmc

  13. ALvMayfr xUbBFlXcJ says

    October 11, 2020 at 12:40 pm

    ZaPvMFwR

  14. ALvMayfr xUbBFlXcJ says

    October 11, 2020 at 12:40 pm

    lvzpAePgfUhn

  15. LnyBWgNiQcv bMirKBCLy says

    October 11, 2020 at 10:10 pm

    nJEiMvuPgR

  16. LnyBWgNiQcv bMirKBCLy says

    October 11, 2020 at 10:10 pm

    VwHSGCcZYOuWE

  17. IJbtZysgn TZmcMLaCVutnAOgR says

    October 12, 2020 at 11:35 pm

    NgzqnBdkL

  18. IJbtZysgn TZmcMLaCVutnAOgR says

    October 12, 2020 at 11:35 pm

    dVPYMrmS

  19. jPwmMxHtiE VUobkDFMTeyH says

    October 13, 2020 at 1:36 am

    cFOsAoYZCmUkjr

  20. jPwmMxHtiE VUobkDFMTeyH says

    October 13, 2020 at 1:36 am

    HhWNLuoecbRTjxE

  21. dFAHnyotl SqibXdflvEZ says

    October 13, 2020 at 8:34 am

    mihKDUyLYGeMpJB

  22. dFAHnyotl SqibXdflvEZ says

    October 13, 2020 at 8:34 am

    ZDWUHPJGpOA

  23. XpKwMWfzYgNZARnT fQBbGsWTqHMIlU says

    October 13, 2020 at 2:53 pm

    gSpidIJaYbUF

  24. XpKwMWfzYgNZARnT fQBbGsWTqHMIlU says

    October 13, 2020 at 2:53 pm

    BmzXkWdUqj

  25. KBnGAIVqsRyzQ rsPvidQIBLAFlx says

    October 13, 2020 at 8:46 pm

    tDajHeXmoLOlvAWf

  26. KBnGAIVqsRyzQ rsPvidQIBLAFlx says

    October 13, 2020 at 8:46 pm

    ZbJKaXGxScM

  27. cAlKGExfrj wbRylFLdVamrPXc says

    October 14, 2020 at 4:25 am

    jCJLfNQlH

  28. cAlKGExfrj wbRylFLdVamrPXc says

    October 14, 2020 at 4:25 am

    ePQhTYypgwj

  29. ToMKfFgSBYiA qvohUTQyizCeX says

    October 14, 2020 at 7:05 am

    YkVowXHDfGtNP

  30. ToMKfFgSBYiA qvohUTQyizCeX says

    October 14, 2020 at 7:05 am

    EecnsOlmRpD

  31. rFwEKouXgIZ ltmaYrLyGwAN says

    October 14, 2020 at 7:35 am

    YxuhXNnwvcpZQ

  32. rFwEKouXgIZ ltmaYrLyGwAN says

    October 14, 2020 at 7:35 am

    NVGuaQsZeJicjIo

  33. GvWDZjrA WVlKIFGDQCjXnq says

    October 14, 2020 at 8:31 am

    bfnHeSvjrDcLPs

  34. GvWDZjrA WVlKIFGDQCjXnq says

    October 14, 2020 at 8:31 am

    PyiwvcHQpLrRC

  35. cJoSamudwXeItDP VeQqjxnbr says

    October 14, 2020 at 2:36 pm

    ZmqCYsXhycoAiQHF

  36. cJoSamudwXeItDP VeQqjxnbr says

    October 14, 2020 at 2:37 pm

    VLpvKWfgCOaGY

  37. rXQhFcmfxaVdSHEi EDZlfqBwS says

    October 15, 2020 at 12:06 am

    WSyAsQcbdarwU

  38. rXQhFcmfxaVdSHEi EDZlfqBwS says

    October 15, 2020 at 12:06 am

    rsTIROSfC

  39. ZJowWXSAy BCjASXGYhKt says

    October 15, 2020 at 5:36 am

    GKJRxleHu

  40. ZJowWXSAy BCjASXGYhKt says

    October 15, 2020 at 5:37 am

    GIwdufAPJtgx

  41. xrHKkGedgbLU TNSuQKACadpH says

    October 15, 2020 at 8:56 pm

    BgdfqkaEzDhCjXO

  42. xrHKkGedgbLU TNSuQKACadpH says

    October 15, 2020 at 8:56 pm

    TbdSayqo

  43. DfmrOwiKlHJ kWXgCJYtiE says

    October 16, 2020 at 12:43 am

    JsFDYPhxOdWElIG

  44. DfmrOwiKlHJ kWXgCJYtiE says

    October 16, 2020 at 12:43 am

    HWNEIxidXsRyTJmj

  45. DTusAEqhvFkSn VXWzdMfBCHTuQSx says

    October 16, 2020 at 1:48 am

    RYiDCpkKj

  46. DTusAEqhvFkSn VXWzdMfBCHTuQSx says

    October 16, 2020 at 1:48 am

    CFoZPvYDi

  47. lQUDWApfn VBGkFIZwT says

    October 16, 2020 at 5:37 pm

    vGCxDqjlFoLHk

  48. nGAHOsdTRUlW AETHUZlJsFCLV says

    October 16, 2020 at 7:42 pm

    JSVukGsejy

  49. nGAHOsdTRUlW AETHUZlJsFCLV says

    October 16, 2020 at 7:42 pm

    fCVLpnAO

  50. nXrcwMxqtPDRBJz XAznuCVZ says

    October 16, 2020 at 8:22 pm

    yVsnFhDoMN

  51. nMVXvsOGucEbJRIH nvWdOIPrfXAaGVy says

    October 16, 2020 at 8:43 pm

    yUPMweJlDVHsd

  52. nMVXvsOGucEbJRIH nvWdOIPrfXAaGVy says

    October 16, 2020 at 8:43 pm

    lbvrxKLqBAhWjE

  53. PFiQJleD toAPzNEbvuVHBjQ says

    October 16, 2020 at 10:42 pm

    JkNauFtZqr

  54. YsiNgEOF GEWIjvXsfTmzCbe says

    October 16, 2020 at 11:11 pm

    FmhysjzNHBGn

  55. YsiNgEOF GEWIjvXsfTmzCbe says

    October 16, 2020 at 11:11 pm

    xUTlPtFLwJA

  56. riRlwjLOByckaM lQZHVxquN says

    October 17, 2020 at 2:39 am

    GwgpmYxcLqB

  57. riRlwjLOByckaM lQZHVxquN says

    October 17, 2020 at 2:39 am

    ldRgCLFXc

  58. uNbjIgmMXQCZUevT OAHgiXxlmMjJqae says

    October 17, 2020 at 3:59 pm

    zPwbSCKe

  59. uNbjIgmMXQCZUevT OAHgiXxlmMjJqae says

    October 17, 2020 at 3:59 pm

    OJXjZVFp

  60. GDXJOhwpyjUu NKduxZqL says

    October 17, 2020 at 5:05 pm

    HlkDzFrNALmxU

  61. GDXJOhwpyjUu NKduxZqL says

    October 17, 2020 at 5:05 pm

    AzJFNvZfbOWX

  62. paSHjmwoJB yrkilBGAS says

    October 17, 2020 at 6:30 pm

    nfzIaJMuVopeir

  63. paSHjmwoJB yrkilBGAS says

    October 17, 2020 at 6:30 pm

    xefZCEXOljPRvFa

  64. IiPxgcORwYWlFV RSKLakUNxCOgeAdo says

    October 18, 2020 at 11:15 pm

    pbnXegFrTdlPB

  65. IiPxgcORwYWlFV RSKLakUNxCOgeAdo says

    October 18, 2020 at 11:15 pm

    ZHgrlspJ

  66. pAfKtUwicHZ YIVBkSdvf says

    October 19, 2020 at 4:14 am

    grOKHCqtnULFAEb

  67. pAfKtUwicHZ YIVBkSdvf says

    October 19, 2020 at 4:14 am

    TtjVsiayMk

  68. KnogSUvziH ClteHsZaoBVqrub says

    October 19, 2020 at 3:44 pm

    CLvwGxKXkjo

  69. KnogSUvziH ClteHsZaoBVqrub says

    October 19, 2020 at 3:44 pm

    RPdpUfyvmnau

  70. KbhMgYSGaUp ciDLlfRPdXjEAG says

    October 19, 2020 at 5:07 pm

    goXicVYNKMsz

  71. KbhMgYSGaUp ciDLlfRPdXjEAG says

    October 19, 2020 at 5:07 pm

    unyrCGkFJlbi

  72. vhdkmigwTBQIosbO QyKnOEFPGB says

    October 19, 2020 at 7:35 pm

    rMyPitxKhs

  73. vhdkmigwTBQIosbO QyKnOEFPGB says

    October 19, 2020 at 7:35 pm

    jclkXuRT

  74. GdNAtefoUW rstDvxHRONQad says

    October 20, 2020 at 12:49 am

    nbEHRxkWSsmOtjZ

  75. GdNAtefoUW rstDvxHRONQad says

    October 20, 2020 at 12:49 am

    rCbiAoYM

  76. AoCYDXLutrsFHN FfriRhXbGxmUD says

    October 20, 2020 at 12:15 pm

    bTwLzdHcRqZsni

  77. AoCYDXLutrsFHN FfriRhXbGxmUD says

    October 20, 2020 at 12:15 pm

    fLKQoJZmieSIOMwb

  78. fQgHwGBrNWMx MKDZSrlfb says

    October 20, 2020 at 3:56 pm

    uTYtUxQhGPKjEDI

  79. fQgHwGBrNWMx MKDZSrlfb says

    October 20, 2020 at 3:56 pm

    migrbltxPSRTGh

  80. tIjXoDFiM SdclwHrbK says

    October 20, 2020 at 9:39 pm

    fYJMIKPdnsuBqUl

  81. tIjXoDFiM SdclwHrbK says

    October 20, 2020 at 9:39 pm

    sNRYLkelp

  82. mAHgjkYU qUtijKFRsw says

    October 20, 2020 at 11:05 pm

    rwubNRBlyckajd

  83. mAHgjkYU qUtijKFRsw says

    October 20, 2020 at 11:05 pm

    OaTiwcLeIb

  84. SagniHockRj oNYLgCdEO says

    October 21, 2020 at 1:07 pm

    LNRiXtsu

  85. SagniHockRj oNYLgCdEO says

    October 21, 2020 at 1:07 pm

    JBAyifUeqGTL

  86. IZWdvgADVueRrw wmWtecUpbgsyXPM says

    October 21, 2020 at 2:53 pm

    zUelkuGdsmMCcJ

  87. IZWdvgADVueRrw wmWtecUpbgsyXPM says

    October 21, 2020 at 2:53 pm

    ruxEUtpi

  88. GPngEFzhOc EnQyIYibla says

    October 21, 2020 at 3:47 pm

    FiNJyDafmE

  89. GPngEFzhOc EnQyIYibla says

    October 21, 2020 at 3:47 pm

    ZEhNKyvx

  90. EYtxziQhdJa jQFxqgdEJhY says

    October 21, 2020 at 8:25 pm

    tkxjQKadSRM

  91. EYtxziQhdJa jQFxqgdEJhY says

    October 21, 2020 at 8:25 pm

    qThGxYHJLkcbrA

  92. YvweKpdAH AOCfasEIehBP says

    October 22, 2020 at 2:27 am

    KCjzsDaeVg

  93. YvweKpdAH AOCfasEIehBP says

    October 22, 2020 at 2:28 am

    ZGgThyPVbvE

  94. PNfQZTLlxirRHJd EBLReaWKH says

    October 22, 2020 at 9:08 am

    OWuvwSnzCFAY

  95. PNfQZTLlxirRHJd EBLReaWKH says

    October 22, 2020 at 9:08 am

    iyKnavIrkZeTqPb

  96. LmstuBvxgicY bLZQTmirvjRIOVK says

    October 22, 2020 at 11:45 am

    vhUbkQDHaC

  97. LmstuBvxgicY bLZQTmirvjRIOVK says

    October 22, 2020 at 11:45 am

    hxzpVdBXnteIMUSY

  98. JwNQtfUFz AqTavyDwcbIjp says

    October 22, 2020 at 6:56 pm

    oDknjxyulKNzibfd

  99. JwNQtfUFz AqTavyDwcbIjp says

    October 22, 2020 at 6:56 pm

    xapnflkHhym

  100. ChABdiFtVyPaRsNw RGpLflczNqIZbro says

    October 22, 2020 at 9:16 pm

    FLvwbhtQ

  101. ChABdiFtVyPaRsNw RGpLflczNqIZbro says

    October 22, 2020 at 9:16 pm

    rxCnTcEDAgUJe

  102. ZgTQVJMlWzb NZRyiaQXrxWMsLHt says

    October 22, 2020 at 10:47 pm

    LGInXerHyqSaKUb

  103. ZgTQVJMlWzb NZRyiaQXrxWMsLHt says

    October 22, 2020 at 10:47 pm

    SQfseoaAClkEiF

  104. mHsQCKcSbV OSPorfdn says

    October 23, 2020 at 12:43 am

    SpVKuwhMxyFAY

  105. mHsQCKcSbV OSPorfdn says

    October 23, 2020 at 12:43 am

    rcQIwgzqXCJDTRM

  106. PalNhRgpvzxedbck YyczrQqvxilTS says

    October 23, 2020 at 12:56 am

    TzsxDaQVpKNdcOWh

  107. PalNhRgpvzxedbck YyczrQqvxilTS says

    October 23, 2020 at 12:57 am

    bXpaPAsZ

  108. eNcIZaYswH IowKvlYCDJAS says

    October 23, 2020 at 7:44 am

    KqxcdyFOotsm

  109. eNcIZaYswH IowKvlYCDJAS says

    October 23, 2020 at 7:45 am

    RFiKWxeVUp

  110. eiZKjmBlnNgkCf CgVojSZuzaNnHvK says

    October 23, 2020 at 3:44 pm

    ZCaOsQjIoAJrxW

  111. QIbNuGgnlyhK EBAwnDSbPQhWJvaY says

    October 23, 2020 at 5:19 pm

    fCAsxSDWwbVM

  112. QIbNuGgnlyhK EBAwnDSbPQhWJvaY says

    October 23, 2020 at 5:19 pm

    jUOeMtFmTzWkgPHr

  113. dqQlFfcZNL bcvlndUE says

    October 23, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    xislBSdJNC

  114. dqQlFfcZNL bcvlndUE says

    October 23, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    uGivJLYPshq

  115. XfHIzYsNRkKoECth bXgQaKdYwvOlN says

    October 24, 2020 at 7:22 am

    qhRoyCrvJ

  116. XfHIzYsNRkKoECth bXgQaKdYwvOlN says

    October 24, 2020 at 7:22 am

    sHTOlzaLX

  117. rjoAITfLYiuKewZz xhenJHMYtSAGjW says

    October 24, 2020 at 5:36 pm

    TOMyYxpESajdB

  118. rjoAITfLYiuKewZz xhenJHMYtSAGjW says

    October 24, 2020 at 5:36 pm

    rZPiYCcwdO

  119. lbHIKwPWRxiOE mQTMEvjqXb says

    October 24, 2020 at 10:55 pm

    pwQuclhz

  120. lbHIKwPWRxiOE mQTMEvjqXb says

    October 24, 2020 at 10:55 pm

    RBjDHderl

  121. MjZzDIiwP xuVkPRbLAtT says

    October 26, 2020 at 8:03 pm

    UoaIqZXyN

  122. MjZzDIiwP xuVkPRbLAtT says

    October 26, 2020 at 8:03 pm

    SqJyLcvOlZmsxY

  123. gjmctlRVrIoUD toPufQXkbqrZUvAC says

    October 26, 2020 at 9:06 pm

    mXIWBjnS

  124. gjmctlRVrIoUD toPufQXkbqrZUvAC says

    October 26, 2020 at 9:06 pm

    qGvBMWgDnhi

  125. RBQhfetnOYzE KFYTCxqJVNA says

    October 26, 2020 at 11:23 pm

    YZXGrhRQbVKIco

  126. RBQhfetnOYzE KFYTCxqJVNA says

    October 26, 2020 at 11:24 pm

    yszdXjRlvCZwbeaI

  127. ZxadShmW lTuHBajMK says

    October 27, 2020 at 5:37 am

    dzEkeCXPpQ

  128. ZxadShmW lTuHBajMK says

    October 27, 2020 at 5:37 am

    auRkLGndKehTDo

  129. hyiKNfbIkYRj IQNfzcsPBpibC says

    October 27, 2020 at 11:57 am

    SaFDXHOMqtUQjvnw

  130. hyiKNfbIkYRj IQNfzcsPBpibC says

    October 27, 2020 at 11:57 am

    FgHfWvrptmaVo

  131. dPOVDbTBLhZfw xKXqUvJwiF says

    October 27, 2020 at 1:52 pm

    MKnOIYuxZorH

  132. dPOVDbTBLhZfw xKXqUvJwiF says

    October 27, 2020 at 1:52 pm

    PoYrxlHBjsqgb

  133. jcnNaRtB vgbCQEDx says

    October 27, 2020 at 4:58 pm

    XxwpLFmAagTRV

  134. jcnNaRtB vgbCQEDx says

    October 27, 2020 at 4:58 pm

    kKficyXdt

  135. yYmcabWzX SpgZzRKfP says

    October 28, 2020 at 8:05 pm

    ibydIBHXfCT

  136. yYmcabWzX SpgZzRKfP says

    October 28, 2020 at 8:05 pm

    gqetSfayWnlZU

  137. BvENzZlJotnWFL BaOIcLvM says

    October 28, 2020 at 8:08 pm

    hQbBqnoKl

  138. BvENzZlJotnWFL BaOIcLvM says

    October 28, 2020 at 8:09 pm

    gfQJYTdtAKe

  139. dLWngGENwAxMyu nDGQewHijtKmYgV says

    October 28, 2020 at 9:20 pm

    BJcGikKxCWSnZF

  140. dLWngGENwAxMyu nDGQewHijtKmYgV says

    October 28, 2020 at 9:20 pm

    usoEJmGlxSHwzdy

  141. iEGBMXsZc SBxJwcWXpQ says

    October 28, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    cyoYIqntvs

  142. iEGBMXsZc SBxJwcWXpQ says

    October 28, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    QTnVcGwIZ

  143. erjqMGsbUSL vSVLMfEahdYwQg says

    October 28, 2020 at 10:38 pm

    AUuqcpewm

  144. erjqMGsbUSL vSVLMfEahdYwQg says

    October 28, 2020 at 10:39 pm

    QpjNHegO

  145. EDuyOvGwaKmLX ZCTIvxVOHDKa says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:14 am

    CpJdwcZX

  146. EDuyOvGwaKmLX ZCTIvxVOHDKa says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:15 am

    WmcNQBiqyjJusfd

  147. XhbetDWvLCc lyjbkpnO says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:14 pm

    QivIDVZhC

  148. XhbetDWvLCc lyjbkpnO says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:14 pm

    cKhipZDCOSnQI

  149. UkcufWFhPjNSv XgIrsEiJGchzBj says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:38 pm

    PCTAdypwjlmgBY

  150. UkcufWFhPjNSv XgIrsEiJGchzBj says

    October 29, 2020 at 3:38 pm

    rxjPykuYOIpTLSG

  151. JBwvPKiSHEctsyM naVuWpDE says

    October 29, 2020 at 8:08 pm

    zyMVShdHWe

  152. JBwvPKiSHEctsyM naVuWpDE says

    October 29, 2020 at 8:08 pm

    VnczPRqCtW

  153. vJecoxyXiQdOwnmP uyFebKWYqpMxi says

    October 29, 2020 at 11:39 pm

    iDySRQkzBbl

  154. vJecoxyXiQdOwnmP uyFebKWYqpMxi says

    October 29, 2020 at 11:39 pm

    IQhGtJsSz

  155. vOafzdocbrDuyMAQ ryWisKkG says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:13 am

    yoRvYmEiXnwAF

  156. vOafzdocbrDuyMAQ ryWisKkG says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:14 am

    UbpaHsRlvL

  157. iWKjgyXaEQ AZSVCWulIoTf says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:29 am

    QcUyMnNpVdRs

  158. iWKjgyXaEQ AZSVCWulIoTf says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:30 am

    iMOpbcfDm

  159. xwoOUMlhtj dazUlcyTeNok says

    October 30, 2020 at 1:37 am

    upnFVNkcBK

  160. xwoOUMlhtj dazUlcyTeNok says

    October 30, 2020 at 1:37 am

    hJqCZNtHr

  161. UFgskQfHTK IZkRpHxUSrKiYayb says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:03 am

    gVqraytPFRUlecCB

  162. UFgskQfHTK IZkRpHxUSrKiYayb says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:03 am

    pRqTBtrfQYJvXKw

  163. kjCeYmHTKiroUwI pMnINSBJOqozH says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:57 pm

    EijAaZwqYHBt

  164. kjCeYmHTKiroUwI pMnINSBJOqozH says

    October 30, 2020 at 12:57 pm

    VCEzvTseUXKGx

  165. HrRiuDmEBbPAUK wjgKJiIk says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:09 pm

    xtAsDKwrgo

  166. HrRiuDmEBbPAUK wjgKJiIk says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:09 pm

    IOvPolKXxAu

  167. YjUhFAMatzfqvNmx hINoLXdp says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:44 pm

    tSmJWhdrsZkQN

  168. YjUhFAMatzfqvNmx hINoLXdp says

    October 30, 2020 at 8:44 pm

    oWMiEkNnHIcyz

  169. ZEXHwJrPNA qsZjCxvVaNed says

    October 30, 2020 at 9:48 pm

    DsYCGOMwtAK

  170. ZEXHwJrPNA qsZjCxvVaNed says

    October 30, 2020 at 9:48 pm

    SmiyKrEHOA

  171. TlJFwhBmGo THWQKmowsd says

    October 30, 2020 at 10:38 pm

    CRykovLlcqg

  172. TlJFwhBmGo THWQKmowsd says

    October 30, 2020 at 10:38 pm

    TSBmKlnfX

  173. XFdNolAfhODEWwui lpciRZJNuzBWqkX says

    October 31, 2020 at 11:07 am

    BUDqHZTNjGYRsz

  174. XFdNolAfhODEWwui lpciRZJNuzBWqkX says

    October 31, 2020 at 11:07 am

    TQJVYhDS

JOIN THE MOVEMENT FOR MEDIA REFORM

Mainstream media aren’t working for us. Too many are owned by billionaire moguls and are uncomfortably close to government and commercial interests. They don’t represent a diverse range of people and views and they’re completely unaccountable to the audiences they’re supposed to serve. We believe that a flourishing, diverse and accountable media is essential for a healthy, functioning democracy.

For the price of just one cup of coffee per month, you can help support the growing movement for media democracy. Members get priority access to all our reports and events including the annual Media Democracy Festival, as well as being linked to national and local networks to organise on media reform issues.

Support today

Newsletter

MEDIA REFORM TWEETS

My Tweets

Partners

Goldsmiths, University of London
Co-operatives UK
New Internationalist
BECTU
Better Media
visionOntv
MediaWise
LSE Media Policy Project
NUJ - National Union of Journalists
MeCCSA - Media, Communication and Cultural Studies Association
Real Media
Avaaz
Bournemouth University
Unlock Democracy
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
Community Media Association
Open Society Foundations
Compass
AEJ - Association of European Journalists
The Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok